Language
and representation
Lexical asymmetry
An imbalance in the meanings of two supposedly matching words. For
example, manliness is seen as strength and womanliness is seen as weakness –
cry like a little girl (associated with being weak).
Semantic derogation
The
negative meanings associated with certain words and how they are used to
denigrate particular groups of people, these words carry negative connotations
that can be used to insult people. Examples include: spastic, cripple, faggot etc.
Semantic reclamation
A process
whereby a word has previously carried negative connotations can be reclaimed by
the group it was used against and turned into something positive.
Pejoration
Semantics move
from positive to negative, for example – gay meant happy and now it means
homosexual.
Amelioration
Semantics move
from negative to positive, for example – cute used to mean cunning and now it
tends to mean sweet and attractive.
Semantic over representation
A fairly
simple idea that just means there are many more words to describe a particular
concept or group of people in their equivalent.
Lexical gaps
Are when we
find no equivalents for certain terms, for example – there isn’t really a female
equivalent for ‘stud’.
Negative semantic space
Suggests that
the terms used to label women are attached to a negative ‘space’, they bring with
them their negative connotations which can only be offset by adding male prefixes
such as ‘male slut’ . Muriel Schultz’s semantic rule proposes that all words
which become associated with women slide down the scale of semantics.
Marked form
Suggests deviation
from the norm, for example – a male nurse.
Unmarked form
The assumed
‘norm’, something that is not limited or specified for example – a horse not a
stallion or mare.
Semantic marking
When the
semantic range of a word is limited or specified for example – a stallion = a
male horse and a mare = a female horse.
Overt marking
Marking that
takes place through suffixes or modification gender, for example ‘ess’ for
females – lioness.
Covert marking
Marking that
is understood, for example – in certain contexts ‘young’ is the marked and ‘old’
is the unmarked, we are asked – ‘how old are you?’ not – ‘how young are you?’
Generic terms and pronouns
Prejudice has
been noted in the generic usage of certain terms, such as – ‘mankind’, taken to
mean both men and women. Alternatives are – ‘humankind’ which is seen as being
more inclusive.
Pronouns being
used to represent both men and women, for example – ‘each student has to hand his homework in’ suggesting that
males are more important than females. The use of non-gender specific pronouns
such as, ‘their’ or the more awkward, ‘he/she’, is seen as being more
inclusive.
Patronising and demeaning usage
‘Alright
darling’, ‘cheer up, love’, these are a couple of the demeaning usages women
have been subjected to by sexist men today.
Words are also used by men to objectify women,
such as ‘tart’, ‘sweetie’, ‘baby’, all of which either trivialise and
infantilise women or make them appear to be sweet tasting consumables, there
for the pleasure of men
No comments:
Post a Comment